Morgan-Reed v. Rackspace Technology, Inc.

S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06491

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Rackspace Technology, Inc.source ↗ filed by Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP · No. 1:26-cv-06491 · 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$68M ▾ Comparables split: Gunnar Optiks (7th Cir.) shows dismissals routinely vacated on factual disputes, and Bayhealth found confidentiality claims viable, but Integris shows state privacy claims against tech-adjacent data sharing remain 'unclear' post-removal fights. Comparable settlements $30M–$68M median $59.50M · n=10 Google LLC and Alp $68M · Google Assistant $68M · Flo, Google, Flurr $59.50M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $25–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Integris Health (10th Cir.) — closest analog for third-party data-sharing privacy claims against a tech/health infrastructure provider, outcome still unresolved. Main risk: Rackspace's role as backend infrastructure provider (not direct consumer-facing) may weaken standing/duty theories, similar to unresolved Integris third-party sharing claims Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2.50M–$90M Class size is speculative absent confirmed breach scope or consumer base; Rackspace's enterprise-only model may sharply limit or eliminate direct consumer class exposure. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts	Filing	Privacy & Wiretap	S.D.N.Y.	2026-07-29	$30M–$68M comparable settlements