S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06443
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elite Source Products, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06443 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are only tangentially relevant: the ECOA OLC opinion addresses a different statute's disparate-impact theory, and Price v. Diab concerns fee-shifting post-default, not merits survival of an ADA accessibility claim. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA accessibility plaintiffs who secure injunctive relief can recover fees, raising defendant's exposure even absent damages. Main risk: No merits-stage ADA accessibility ruling in the comparable set makes dismissal odds hard to calibrate; risk of early dismissal for mootness if defendant remediates quickly. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$125K Extremely thin comparable set (no ADA merits rulings, no settlements, no verdicts, no defendant history) — figures are illustrative, not empirically grounded. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-29 | –$125K rough EV |