S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06442
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hight Enterprises, Ltd.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06442 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs can secure injunctive relief and fee awards even via default judgment, raising exposure for non-responsive defendants. No settlement or verdict data exists for this specific defendant or fact pattern. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — shows ADA accessibility claims can succeed with injunctive relief plus fee-shifting even without contested merits litigation. Main risk: Title III ADA claims typically yield injunctive relief only, not damages, unless paired with NY state/city human rights claims allowing monetary recovery. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$100K Extremely limited data; class size, damages theory (federal vs. state overlay), and defendant scope are inferred, not confirmed. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-29 | –$100K rough EV |