S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06436
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WeWork Inc.source ↗ filed by Tauler Smith LLP, California · No. 1:26-cv-06436 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$68M ▾{
"outlook": "mixed",
"confidence": "low",
"rationale": "Clements v. Gunnar Optiks shows courts reluctant to dismiss privacy/biometric claims on the pleadings when factual questions on consent/data use remain, and Bayhealth allowed a confidentiality claim to survive against a tracking-technology theory. But Integris shows parallel privacy claims can stay 'unclear' pending remand, reflecting Comparable settlements $30M–$68M median $59.50M · n=10 Google LLC and Alp $68M · Google Assistant $68M · Flo, Google, Flurr $59.50M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $25–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-28 | $30M–$68M comparable settlements |