S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06411
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSS Beauty, Inc.source ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · No. 1:26-cv-06411 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are off-point: the ECOA opinion is unrelated to ADA accessibility, and Price v. Diab only addresses fee-shifting after default judgment, not merits survival. No accessibility-specific merits rulings or settlements for this defendant exist in the record. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA accessibility plaintiffs can recover fees even via default judgment, signaling low-risk, fee-driven litigation dynamics. Main risk: Federal ADA Title III provides no compensatory damages, so recovery may hinge entirely on injunctive relief and attorney's fees, per Price v. Diab. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$125K Sample too thin for statistical confidence; no ADA-specific settlement or verdict data exists for this defendant or theory. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-28 | –$125K rough EV |