S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06397
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Furnitureland South, Inc.source ↗ filed by C/O Gottlieb & Associates PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-06397 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA accessibility claims can succeed via default judgment and support injunctive relief, but the same case shows fee-shifting/attorney's fee entitlement is contested and reversible. No direct ADA merits rulings adverse to plaintiffs are in the sample, but sample is thin and mostly procedural. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA accessibility claims survive to judgment, but attorney's fee recovery as 'prevailing party' is not guaranteed. Main risk: Federal ADA claims typically yield injunctive relief only, not damages; monetary exposure hinges on pendent state/city human rights claims, which are unaddressed here. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$125K Sample lacks direct ADA settlement or verdict data; figures are rough proxies from statutory/state-law analogs, not case-specific evidence. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-28 | –$125K rough EV |