S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06395
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title Boxing, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · Judge Andrew Lamar Carter Jr. · No. 1:26-cv-06395 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparable rulings (Price v. Diab) show ADA accessibility claims can succeed via default judgment plus fee-shifting, but Title III itself yields no damages absent parallel state/city claims. OLC ECOA guidance is not directly on-point but signals courts require clear textual/intent basis for liability theories. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms plaintiffs prevailing on ADA accessibility claims can recover fees even via default, relevant if Title Boxing fails to respond or settles quickly. Main risk: Title III alone provides only injunctive relief, capping monetary exposure unless plaintiff pleads NYSHRL/NYCHRL damages claims. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$250K Extremely limited comparables; no direct settlement data; figures are rough proxies pending case-specific facts on claims pled (federal vs. state/city law) and class scope. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-28 | –$250K rough EV |