S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06393
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brighton-Best International, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06393 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are only loosely on-point: Price v. Diab confirms fee-shifting for prevailing ADA plaintiffs even on default judgment, suggesting courts favor plaintiffs procedurally, while the ECOA ruling is unrelated to accessibility theory. Key precedent: Price v. Diab - shows ADA plaintiffs can recover fees even via default judgment, raising defendant's exposure to fast, low-cost resolution. Main risk: Single-plaintiff ADA claims often resolve cheaply via quick settlement/injunction, but fee-shifting (per Price v. Diab) can inflate real cost. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K Comparables are not directly on ADA accessibility merits; estimate relies on general S.D.N.Y. settlement patterns, not case-specific data. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-28 | $2K–$10K rough EV |