E.D. Wis. · No. 2:26-cv-01307
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basement Bros LLCsource ↗ filed by Strauss Borrelli PLLC · Judge Lynn S. Adelman · No. 2:26-cv-01307 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $20.50M–$76M ▾TCPA robocall theory has split outcomes: Howard v. RNC and Hulce v. Zipongo affirmed dismissal on similar automated-message theories, while League of Women Voters v. Kramer allowed a TCPA robocall claim to survive MTD. Basement Bros LLC appears to be a small regional business, unlike the large national defendants in comparable settlements. Comparable settlements $20.50M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10 Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $10–$500 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Dish Network, L.L.C. $61M · ccAdvertising $32.42M Key precedent: League of Women Voters v. Kramer (D.N.H.) - most factually similar surviving TCPA robocall claim, showing plausible path past MTD if consent/injury pled well. Main risk: Dismissal on 'initiation' or 'telephone solicitation' grounds as in Hulce v. Zipongo and Howard v. RNC, where automated contact didn't meet TCPA's technical definitions. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$175K Class size and defendant scale are speculative from thin web signals; no prior TCPA case history for this specific defendant. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D. Wis. | 2026-07-27 | $20.50M–$76M comparable settlements |