D.D.C. · No. 1:26-cv-02637
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANSUNION, LLCsource ↗ filed by Rkw Law Group · No. 1:26-cv-02637 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾FCRA furnisher claims often survive only partially, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage where most counts were dismissed but some allowed to proceed; Askins v. CRST shows disclosure-based FCRA claims can survive standing challenges. TransUnion's own $40M Ninth Circuit verdict shows real trial exposure once liability is established. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · RentGrow $2.25M · Equifax $2.20M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: TransUnion, LLC — $40.0M jury verdict (Ninth Circuit) shows this defendant has faced and lost large FCRA trials before, raising settlement leverage. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage (Counts II, III, V dismissed). This defendant: TransUnion has prior large FCRA exposure ($40M verdict) and an active related filing (Pinney v. TransUnion), suggesting recurring FCRA litigation pattern. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $40K–$22.50M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; class size and per-member figures highly speculative absent case-specific facts on scope of alleged FCRA violation. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D.D.C. | 2026-07-27 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |