M.D. Fla. · No. 2:26-cv-02254
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.source ↗ filed by Ogletree Deakins, PC · No. 2:26-cv-02254 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA accessibility claims can succeed and support fee-shifting even via default judgment, but the ECOA comparable is inapposite and offers no guidance on Title III merits standards here. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA plaintiffs prevailing on accessibility claims can recover fees, showing viable path to relief. Main risk: ADA Title III provides only injunctive relief/attorney's fees, not damages, capping monetary exposure regardless of merits outcome. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$30K Small, non-analogous comparable set (one ECOA opinion, one 9th Cir. fee case); true monetary value hinges almost entirely on fee-shifting, not damages. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-27 | –$30K rough EV |