D. Or. · No. 6:26-cv-01538
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RV Retailer Oregon, LLCsource ↗ filed by JTK Law LLC · Judge Amy E. Potter · No. 6:26-cv-01538 · 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$68M ▾Clements v. Gunnar Optiks (7th Cir.) shows privacy/biometric claims often survive dismissal due to unresolved factual questions on consent and exclusions, and Bayhealth found a duty-based privacy claim adequately pled. But Integris shows related state privacy claims can remain unresolved even after removal battles. Comparable settlements $30M–$68M median $59.50M · n=10 Google Assistant $68M · Google $68M · Flo/Google/Flurry $59.50M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $20–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Clements v. Gunnar Optiks — vacated dismissal shows courts reluctant to resolve consent/exclusion defenses at pleading stage, favoring plaintiffs early on. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead actionable interception/consent violation, as seen in unresolved Integris privacy claims Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$750K Comparable settlements are from massive tech/health defendants; scaling to a regional RV retailer introduces significant uncertainty in class size and recovery. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Or. | 2026-07-24 | $30M–$68M comparable settlements |