← Daily briefing · What cases settle for →
A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
2,704 records · $65.37B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / comps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TransUnionsource ↗ common fund · ~$25/member · No. 2:18-cv-05225-GAM | Settlement | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | United States District Court - Eastern District of Pennsylvania | 2026-09-23 | $8.31M |
| VSL#3source ↗ common fund · ~$800/member · No. 8:19-cv-02173-LKG | Settlement | False Advertising | N.D. Cal. | 2026-09-23 | $20M |
| Grubhubsource ↗ common fund · $25 and up (proportional to miles driven) /member · No. 3:15-cv-05128 JSC | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | N.D. Cal. | 2026-09-23 | $5M |
| MG217source ↗ common fund | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-09-23 | $1.20M | |
| Krogersource ↗ common fund · Pro rata share based on out-of-pocket Kroger Rx spending /member | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio (Columbus) | 2026-09-23 | $17M |
| Snap Inc.source ↗ common fund · No. 2:21-cv-08892-GW-RAO | Settlement | False Advertising | United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division | 2026-09-23 | $65M |
| Fandangosource ↗ common fund · ~$3/member · No. 25CU046749N | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego | 2026-09-23 | $9.40M |
| Lands' Endsource ↗ claims-made | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Long & Foster Real Estate Inc. and Sherry B. Benson, Administrator, Estate of Johnny W. Bensonsource ↗ | Verdict | False Advertising | Fairfax County Circuit Court | 2026-09-23 | $1.03M |
| Yes Communitiessource ↗ claims-made | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-23 | ||
| HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al.source ↗ No. 5:15-cv-02057 | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | C.D. Cal. | 2026-09-23 | |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.source ↗ No. 18-cv-03095-PKC-JMW | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | E.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-23 | |
| Playstudios, Inc.source ↗ filed by SGB | Filing | State-court filings (notable) | King County Superior Court | 2026-09-23 | |
| Contractors.com & One Planet Ops Inc.source ↗ common fund · No. 19-2-24212-4 SEA | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | Superior Court for the State of Washington in and for King County | 2026-09-23 | $1.53M |
| Equifaxsource ↗ common fund · ~147,000,000 members · up to $600 /member · No. 1:22-cv-04754-MLB | Settlement | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia | 2026-09-23 | $2.20M |
| ccAdvertisingsource ↗ | Verdict | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | Eastern District of Missouri (affirmed by Eighth Circuit) | 2026-09-23 | $32.42M |
| Sprouts Farmers Marketsource ↗ common fund · TBD /member · class counsel: Sourthern California Attorneys, Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, Law Offices of Todd Friedman PC · defense: Littler Mendelson, P.C., Dorsey and Whitney LLP · No. 22STCV26572 · view case timeline → | Settlement | False Advertising | Los Angeles County Superior Court | 2026-09-23 | $5M |
| Comcastsource ↗ common fund · No. 2:23-cv-05039-JMY | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania | 2026-09-23 | $117.50M |
| Krispy Kremesource ↗ common fund · ~$75/member · class counsel: Terpening Law PLLC, Ranchor Harris Law, PLLC · defense: Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Robinson, Bradshaw and Hinson · No. 3:25-cv-00434 · view case timeline → | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina | 2026-09-23 | $1.60M |
| Bank of Americasource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Tycko & Zavareei LLP, Gary W. Jackson, Attorney at Law · defense: Winston & Strawn, LLP · No. 11-CV-00733-WHP · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York | 2026-09-23 | $2.25M |
| Grubhub Inc.source ↗ common fund · $25 and up (proportional to miles driven) /member · No. 3:15-cv-05128 JSC · view case timeline → | Settlement | False Advertising | N.D. Cal. | 2026-09-23 | $5M |
| Google LLCsource ↗ common fund · No. 18-CV-328915 · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Santa Clara County Superior Court | 2026-09-23 | $5M |
| Ashley Furniture, Nectar, DreamCloud, Sienasource ↗ common fund · minimum $35 store voucher /member · No. 21STCV09403 | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles | 2026-09-23 | $9M |
| Premier Nutrition Corporationsource ↗ common fund · ~$20/member · class counsel: Lynch Carpenter, LLP, Blood Hurst O'Reardon LLP, Altair Law · defense: Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Venable LLP, Duane Morris LLP · No. 1:17-cv-05987 · view case timeline → | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York | 2026-09-23 | $90M |
| Flo, Google, and Flurrysource ↗ common fund · Varies /member · No. 3:21-cv-00757 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California | 2026-09-23 | $59.50M |
| Googlesource ↗ common fund · No. 5:20-cv-07956-VKD | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose Division | 2026-09-23 | $68M |
| Amazonsource ↗ common fund · ~35,000,000 members · ~$51/member · No. 2:23-cv-00932-JHC | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington | 2026-09-23 | $2.50B |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc.source ↗ The court held that Anu failed to state an FCRA claim against Truist because he never alleged that the reported balance or delinquency information was actually inaccurate · view case timeline → | Opinion | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D.D.C. | 2026-09-22 | MTD granted |
| Centurylink, Inc.source ↗ The Ninth Circuit held CenturyLink was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under the Safeco safe-harbor because its interpretation of 'initiated' a business transacti · view case timeline → | Opinion | False Advertising | 9th Cir. | 2026-09-22 | reversed |
| ALO PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, INC.source ↗ No. 1:26-cv-05884 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D.N.Y | 2026-09-22 | |
| 13123 Rockaway Property Inc.source ↗ No. 1:26-cv-05885 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D.N.Y | 2026-09-22 | |
| 47-23 Vernon Blvd LLCsource ↗ No. 1:26-cv-05886 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D.N.Y | 2026-09-22 | |
| Bones Brands LLCsource ↗ No. 1:26-cv-08266 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-22 | |
| Fabula Holdings, Inc.source ↗ No. 1:26-cv-08267 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-22 | |
| Natren Inc.source ↗ No. 1:26-cv-08268 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-22 | |
| Blue Yonder Partners, LLCsource ↗ Judge Shalina D. Kumar · No. 2:26-cv-13583 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D. Mich. | 2026-09-22 | |
| Costar Realty Information, Inc.source ↗ filed by Hedin LLP · No. 5:26-cv-05548 · 28:1346 Tort Claim · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims tied to web tracking show split outcomes: Bayhealth survived a confidentiality claim while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed with prejudice; Integris shows state privacy claims can survive removal but face fact-intensive scrutiny. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality claims from tracking tech can survive MTD when a duty analogous to provider-patient trust exists, though CoStar lacks that fiduciary posture. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory grounds akin to Tower Health/Santoro, where pixel/tracking claims failed for lack of individually-identifiable harm or standing. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5M–$250M No prior CoStar privacy litigation on record; class size and claim theory (wiretap vs. tracking) remain speculative without complaint details. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | C.D. Cal. | 2026-09-22 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |
| Atlas Coffee Club LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08222 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal of ADA claims for lack of proof of effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations on summary judgment. Small e-commerce ADA web-accessibility suits in S.D.N.Y. often survive MTD but settle cheaply. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows plaintiffs bear burden proving proposed accessibility fix is effective, a common failure point in web ADA suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show a concrete, effective accessibility remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$30K Small sample, no defendant-specific history, and settlement comps are for larger entities—true recovery for a small coffee subscription defendant likely far lower. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-22 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |
| Canvas 340, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08223 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) affirmed dismissal where plaintiffs failed to prove reasonable modification, while Holmes v. Bax and Price v. Diab show ADA claims and fee awards surviving when concrete barriers/relief are shown. Outcome is fact-specific to the accessibility barrier alleged. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — controlling circuit precedent in S.D.N.Y., shows plaintiff bears burden to prove effective remedy or claim fails at pleading/summary stage. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plausibly plead an effective, reasonable accommodation/modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$150K Small, noisy sample; web signals are largely irrelevant to this defendant, so class size and recovery are highly speculative. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-22 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |
| Room & Board, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08224 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable rulings split evenly: Lowell v. Lyft and Billesdon show ADA accessibility claims dismissed absent proof of effective remedy, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. Outcome is fact-specific to accommodation reasonableness. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — SDNY circuit precedent placing burden on plaintiff to prove proposed accommodation is effective, a common failure point. Main risk: Plaintiff fails to show proposed modification/accommodation is reasonable and effective, as in Lowell v. Lyft dismissal Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $15K–$250K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; ADA Title III yields no monetary damages so 'per-member' reflects fee/settlement proxies, not statutory damages. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-22 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |
Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.