A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
140 records · $7.80B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / ruling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discover No. 1:23-CV-4676 | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois | 2026-07-18 | $1.20B |
| Flo | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-07-18 | $59.50M | |
| Circle K | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-18 | ||
| Hillcrest Convalescent Center | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-18 | ||
| Motility Software Solutions | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-18 | ||
| Sony No. 21-cv-03361-AMO | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | N.D. Cal. | 2026-07-18 | $7.85M |
| LastPass up to $25 Statutory Payment, or up to $300 Ordinary Loss Relief, or up to $10,000 Extraordinary Loss Relief, plus $100 California Statutory Damages Payment for California residents, plus up to $900,000 Crypto Pool reimbursement /member · No. 1:22-cv-12047-PBS | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts | 2026-07-18 | $8.20M |
| Nelnet No. 4:22-cv-3191 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska | 2026-07-18 | $10M |
| Nutramax Laboratories up to $150 /member · No. 5:19-CV-00835-FMO-SP | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California | 2026-07-18 | $11.50M |
| Aurobindo, Hetero and Vivimed Aurobindo: up to $100 (up to $200 with proof of purchase); Hetero: up to $40 per 30-day supply (max $120); Vivimed: to be determined /member · No. 1:19-md-02875-RBK-SAK | Settlement | False Advertising | United States District Court for the District of New Jersey | 2026-07-18 | $15.20M |
| Lakeview Loan Servicing No. 1:22-cv-20955-GAYLES | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | United States District Court, Southern District of Florida | 2026-07-18 | $26M |
| SiriusXM TBD /member · No. 2:22-cv-2261-CSB-EIL | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Urbana Division | 2026-07-18 | $28M |
| Wells Fargo No. 1:20-cv-04494-JLR-SN | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-18 | $33M |
| Kaiser Permanente $20 and $40 /member | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | United States District Court for the Northern District of California | 2026-07-18 | $47.50M |
| Google No. 5:20-cv-07956-VKD | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose Division | 2026-07-18 | $68M |
| Amazon up to $51 /member · No. 2:23-cv-00932-JHC | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington | 2026-07-18 | $2.50B |
| MII Brand Import, LLC Judge Franklin Ulyses Valderrama · No. 1:26-cv-08502 · 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Ill. | 2026-07-17 | |
| BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. filed by Read Legal LLC · No. 2:26-cv-04987 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act Outlook: adverse · est. $500K–$18M ▾Both comparable rulings resulted in dismissal of consumer-credit claims: Eiler upheld inclusion of settlement in income (rejecting FCRA fee-shifting argument) and Grimes dismissed FDCPA/CSPA counterclaims outright. No comparable ruling shows a case surviving to merits, though sample is only two rulings. Est. value $500K–$18M = P(survival) × class × per-member Survival: ~0-30% — 0 of 2 comparable rulings resulted in claims surviving dismissal Class size: 10,000–2,000,000 — BofA's scale (23-26B digital interactions/yr) implies large affected population, but actual class definition unknown Per member: $50–$300 — FCRA/FDCPA statutory range $100-1000 discounted ~20-30% to typical realized settlement fraction Key precedent: Portfolio Recovery v. Grimes — direct FDCPA counterclaim dismissed, most analogous procedural posture to a new FDCPA/FCRA filing. Main risk: Courts in comparables dismissed FCRA/FDCPA claims on threshold/jurisdictional grounds, as in Grimes, before reaching damages. Only 2 comparable rulings (both adverse) and 2 unrelated settlements; true class size and certification odds are speculative. · grounded in 2 rulings + 2 settlements | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-07-17 | $500K–$18M est. value |
| Columbia Brands Usa, LLC filed by Law Office of Pelayo Duran, PA · Judge Julie Sneed · No. 6:26-cv-01536 · Americans with Disabilities Act Outlook: uncertain · est. –$75K ▾Price v. Diab shows fee-shifting entitlement for prevailing ADA plaintiffs can be reversed on appeal, creating uncertainty even after default judgment. No settlement data exists for this defendant or theory, limiting benchmarking. Est. value –$75K = P(survival) × class × per-member Survival: ~50% — 1 of 1 comparable ruling shows mixed outcome (injunction affirmed, fees reversed) Class size: 1–5 — ADA Title III cases are typically individual/small group actions, not large classes; no class-size web signals apply Per member: $0–$15000 — ADA Title III lacks statutory damages; recovery is injunctive relief plus attorney's fees, discounted for fee-shifting risk Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - shows attorney's fee entitlement under ADA can be reversed even after injunctive relief is affirmed, raising recovery uncertainty. Main risk: Fee-shifting entitlement itself may be reversed on appeal, as in Price v. Diab, even after injunctive relief is secured. Single comparable ruling and no settlement data severely limit reliability; ADA Title III cases rarely proceed as class actions. · grounded in 1 rulings + 0 settlements | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-16 | –$75K est. value |
| Dollar Tree Judge Wendy Williams Berger · No. 3:26-cv-01819 · 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age) | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-16 | |
| American Honda Motor Co., Inc. filed by Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC · No. 2:26-cv-07823 · 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) Outlook: mixed · est. $2.50M–$80M ▾KetoNatural shows false advertising claims can survive 12(b)(6) if statements are literally false commercial speech, but Mehl shows preemption/field-specific defenses can doom claims outright. No prior Honda advertising rulings exist to calibrate risk further. Est. value $2.50M–$80M = P(survival) × class × per-member Survival: ~50-60% — 2 of 3 comparable false advertising rulings allowed claims to proceed at least in part Class (from complaint): Owners or lessees of 2018-2022 Honda Accords, 2016-2022 Honda Civics, and 2017-2022 Honda CR-Vs equipped with the 1.5-liter i-VTEC turbocharged gasoline direct injection Class size: 50,000–2,000,000 — Honda's large US vehicle sales volume; scope depends on specific model/advertising claim at issue Per member: $50–$400 — Price-premium restitution theory, discounted to ~10-20% of nominal statutory/economic harm per settlement patterns Key precedent: KetoNatural v. Hill's Pet Nutrition — shows false advertising claims survive when defendant's own statements are plausibly literally false commercial speech. Main risk: Preemption or failure to plead literal falsity/actionable commercial speech, as in Mehl and part of KetoNatural (non-party statements dismissed). Small comparable sample, no defendant-specific history, and class size/per-member figures are rough estimates absent case-specific product/claim details. · grounded in 4 rulings + 8 settlements | Filing | False Advertising | C.D. Cal. | 2026-07-16 | $2.50M–$80M est. value |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. filed by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP · No. 1:26-cv-02493 · 42:1396 - Tort Negligence Outlook: uncertain · est. $15M–$70M ▾No prior rulings exist for Privacy & Wiretap theory, so survival odds are unmodeled; comparable settlements (Google $68M, Flo $59.5M) show large tech-privacy cases settle high but only after surviving early motions. Est. value $15M–$70M = P(survival) × class × per-member Survival: insufficient data — no comparable rulings on record for this theory Class size: 100,000,000–300,000,000 — US-based Meta MAU/DAU subset per Statista/Meta Q4 2025 report Per member: $0.1–$0.3 — CIPA-style $5,000 statutory anchor discounted ~0.005% to match realized settlement scale in comps Key precedent: None on record for this theory; Google/Flo settlements suggest wiretap-style claims against major platforms are viable enough to reach settlement. Main risk: Class certification and Article III standing challenges, common in wiretap suits absent concrete harm allegations Small sample of settlements, no rulings, and mismatch between statutory anchors and actual per-member payouts limit precision. · grounded in 0 rulings + 8 settlements | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.D.C. | 2026-07-16 | $15M–$70M est. value |
| Nutricost | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Serviceaide | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Gametime | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Menard | Settlement | Product Liability | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Tom's of Maine | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Beef Industry | Settlement | Antitrust / Price-Fixing | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Barefoot Dreams | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Google Play | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Labcorp AMCA | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Fidelity Investments | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Trader Joe's | Settlement | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | 2026-07-16 | $7.40M | |
| INVITAE CORPORATION filed by Kirkland & Ellis LLP · Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow · No. 1:26-cv-08376 · 28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Ill. | 2026-07-15 | |
| Bozzuto Management Company The court certified two Rule 23(b)(3) damages classes (Drip-Pricing and Overcharge) because common legal theories and calculable, relatively small damages predominated ov | Opinion | False Advertising | D.D.C. | 2026-07-15 | class certified in part |
| Bank of America Judge Kenneth Davis Bell Sr. · No. 3:26-cv-00567 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | W.D.N.C. | 2026-07-15 | |
| Dolgencorp, LLC filed by Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC · Judge William Lynn Campbell Jr. · No. 3:26-cv-00977 · 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage Outlook: uncertain · est. $1M–$60M ▾No rulings exist yet for this theory, so we rely solely on settlement comps like Google ($68M) and Flo ($59.5M), which show wiretap/privacy claims often resolve rather than get dismissed outright. Est. value $1M–$60M = P(survival) × class × per-member Survival: ~50% — no direct rulings; inferred from mixed settlement outcomes (5 of 7 settled meaningfully, 2 at $0) Class size: 500,000–5,000,000 — Dollar General's nationwide retail footprint and large digital/app customer base per web signals Per member: $2–$40 — CIPA-style $5,000 statutory anchor discounted ~99% to realized class settlement fraction seen in comparable cases Key precedent: None on record; closest analog is Google/Flo settlements showing large tech-retail privacy claims typically settle in $47-68M range. Main risk: Two of seven comparable settlements (Google Play, Barefoot Dreams) resolved for $0, showing dismissal or de minimis exposure is plausible. No rulings or defendant history exist; estimate rests entirely on cross-theory settlement comps and rough class-size inference. · grounded in 0 rulings + 7 settlements | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Tenn. | 2026-07-15 | $1M–$60M est. value |
| Citizens Debt Relief, LLC filed by Sulaiman Law Group · Judge Virginia Maria Hernandez Covington · No. 8:26-cv-02028 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act Outlook: uncertain · est. $100K–$7.50M ▾No prior rulings exist for Privacy & Wiretap claims against this defendant, so survival odds are unanchored. Comparable settlements (Google $68M, Flo $59.5M) involve mass-scale tech/health platforms, not a small debt-relief company, limiting analogical value. Est. value $100K–$7.50M = P(survival) × class × per-member Survival: ~40-50% — no direct rulings; comparable theory shows mixed settlement outcomes including zero-recovery cases Class size: 5,000–50,000 — Debt-relief company with BBB/LinkedIn presence but no evidence of mass consumer base like tech platforms Per member: $20–$150 — CIPA-style $5,000 statutory max discounted heavily per typical wiretap class realization (~1-3%) Key precedent: None on record; closest analogues (Flo, Google) involve health/location data at far larger scale, limiting direct applicability. Main risk: Two of seven comparable settlements resolved at $0.0M (Google Play, Barefoot Dreams), showing wiretap claims can fail entirely. Small sample, no rulings/prior records for defendant, and class size is inferred, not confirmed. · grounded in 0 rulings + 7 settlements | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-15 | $100K–$7.50M est. value |
| Apple Inc. filed by Almeida Law Group LLC · Judge Virginia K. Demarchi · No. 3:26-cv-07274 · 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Cal. | 2026-07-15 | |
| Warner No. 6:26-cv-01456 | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Or. | 2026-07-15 |