Sealed forensic record · Report #876

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationHQ: Indiana

Nat'l classScope varies — see report

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target

ClaimsCCPA Civ. Code §1798.135 (opt-out) / CPRA / Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11 §7025 (GPC must be honored)

**GPC / CCPA Do-Not-Sell** A consumer-facing platform allegedly fails to honor Global Privacy Control (GPC) opt-out signals and does not provide a functional "Do Not Sell My Personal Information" mechanism as required under California Civil Code §1798.135 and the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), in violation of Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11 §7025. The platform fires 317 third-party trackers across its property. Four pages exhibit accessibility violations. No verbatim representations of opt-out language or GPC-honor statements were captured during the run. The sealed PDF chain-of-custody contains approximately 15–25 pages and 45 screenshots documenting tracker activity and page structure.

Case theory: CCPA §1798.135 / CPRA / 11 CCR §7025

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase

✓ Prior-litigation check: clear. No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory (CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-08-05).
No same-kind case against this defendant (federal RECAP + web, <3yr).