ADA / Web Accessibility
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 9, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #708
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: Wisconsin
Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law
**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Consumer Platform**
This matter alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act Title III, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and New York State Human Rights Law under the framework established in *Robles v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.*, 9th Cir. The defendant, a consumer-facing platform, maintained a website with accessibility barriers that prevented users with disabilities from equal access to goods and services.
The site captured 15 accessibility violations across scanned pages. Third-party tracking infrastructure fired 47 times during the audit. The defendant made environmental claims including: "plastic products with plastic waste removed from the ocean," "plastic products with plastic waste removed from the ocean and giving it a second life," "RSP is ISO 14001 Registered," "RSP offers manufacturing materials from leading ocean plastics suppliers that utilize a verified supply chain from the world's oceans, rivers and shores," "RSP has molded over 50 metric tons of recycled ocean-bound plastic," and "This is equivalent to saving about 10,000 gallons of gasoline or the carbon sequestered by more than 75 acres of trees in just one year."
Sealed PDF: 20 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals; ~15–25 pages total.
Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-09).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.