ADA / Web Accessibility
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 7, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #701
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: California
Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law
**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Consumer-Facing Platform**
This case invokes Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the *Robles v. Domino's* framework (9th Cir.), along with the Unruh Civil Rights Act and New York State Human Rights Law. The defendant is a consumer-facing platform making health and wellness claims tied to fermented food products.
The website contains 10 accessibility violations across scanned pages. The platform makes representations including "For 30 years our living foods have been authentically fueled by plants, raw fermentation, naturally occurring probiotics, and ancient wisdom," "9 Billion Living Probiotics," "Supports 9 Whole-Body Benefits," "Raw & Unpasteurized," "Real Fermentation For 30 Days," "Naturally Occurring Enzymes," and "Fully fermented for 30 days." No third-party trackers were detected.
Nine screenshots with chain-of-custody seals document the violations. The sealed PDF runs 15–25 pages.
Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-07).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.