ADA / Web Accessibility
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 8, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #680
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: California
Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III
ArbitrationClass-viable — browsewrap, likely unenforceable
ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law
**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Consumer Platform**
This defendant operates a consumer-facing digital platform. Under *Robles v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.* (9th Cir. 2021) and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, websites must be equally accessible to users with disabilities. New York State Human Rights Law imposes parallel obligations.
The agent captured 5 accessibility violations across the platform's interface. Third-party tracker activity totaled 320 fires, indicating extensive data collection infrastructure. No verbatim user-facing representations were secured during this run.
Documentation includes 34 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals, compiled into a sealed PDF of approximately 15–25 pages.
Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.