ADA / Web Accessibility
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 8, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #670
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: California
Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law
**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Consumer Platform**
This matter alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and New York State Human Rights Law, following *Robles v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.* (9th Cir. 2020), which established that website accessibility obligations extend to public accommodations' digital interfaces.
A consumer-facing platform was scanned across 15–25 pages. The audit identified 5 accessibility violations affecting user navigation and content perception. Third-party tracking code was detected firing 9 times during the scan, independent of the accessibility findings. Screenshots with forensic chain-of-custody seals document the technical state of the interface at time of capture.
No affirmative representations regarding accessibility or compliance were recovered from the defendant's public-facing materials.
**Sealed PDF: ~15–25 pages, 13 screenshots with chain-of-custody authentication.**
Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.