FDA Misclaim
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 8, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #664
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationU.S. · operates nationally
Nat'l classNationwide plausible — FTC §5 / FDCA
ArbitrationClass-viable — browsewrap, likely unenforceable
ClaimsFTC §5 / FDCA §503A misbranding / CLRA / Lanham Act
**FTC §5 / FDCA §503A Misbranding – Compounded Collagen & Wellness Claims**
Consumer-facing platform marketing collagen peptides and wellness supplements with unsubstantiated health claims. Run captured 75 verbatim representations, including "Crafted with clinically proven Type I bovine collagen peptides," "Supports skin, joint and whole-body health," "Reduce fatigue, soothe body and mind," and "100 Felt their skin was more hydrated." Representations invoke clinical proof and targeted health outcomes without disclosed substantiation or compounding disclaimers required under FDCA §503A. Secondary findings: 670 third-party tracker fires and 5 accessibility violations across scanned pages.
51 screenshots with sealed chain-of-custody. Sealed PDF: ~15–25 pages.
Case theory: FTC §5 / FDCA misbranding
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.