FDA Misclaim
Flagship
$1,000
Captured Jun 8, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #663
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationU.S. · operates nationally
Nat'l classNationwide plausible — FTC §5 / FDCA
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsFTC §5 / FDCA §503A misbranding / CLRA / Lanham Act
**FTC §5 / FDCA §503A Misbranding — Compounded Collagen Claims**
Consumer-facing platform making unsubstantiated efficacy and superiority claims for collagen supplements. Agent captured 13 verbatim representations including "100% clinically proven results from the UK's largest, most robust clinical trial of a collagen supplement, ever," "100% Saw an improvement in fine lines & wrinkles," "27% Increase in hair strands," and "60% Boost in skin elasticity." Platform also asserts "[DEFENDANT] is the UK's #1 EXPERT-BACKED COLLAGEN SUPPLEMENT." Separately, 203 third-party tracker fires detected across site pages. Three accessibility violations identified. No wrap evidence. Sealed PDF chain-of-custody: 13 screenshots, ~15–25 pages.
Case theory: FTC §5 / FDCA misbranding
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.