Greenwashing
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 7, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #661
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: Michigan
Nat'l classNationwide plausible — FTC / Lanham
ArbitrationClass-viable — browsewrap, likely unenforceable
ClaimsFTC §5 / Green Guides (16 CFR 260) / Lanham Act §43(a) / UCL §17200 / FAL §17500 / CLRA
**GREENWASHING / ECO CLAIMS**
FTC §5, Green Guides (16 CFR 260), Lanham Act §43(a), UCL §17200, FAL §17500, CLRA — claims of carbon neutrality, recyclability, and sustainable materials without substantiation.
A consumer-facing platform makes unqualified environmental representations across product lines. The defendant claims "Our sugar plastic bottles made from sugarcane reduce your carbon footprint and are 100% recyclable through municipal facilities" and states products are "made from a renewable, sustainable alternative to petroleum-based plastic that fights climate change by capturing CO₂ from the atmosphere as it grows." The defendant also asserts "[DEFENDANT] Toitū net carbonzero certified factory" and "[DEFENDANT] Toitū net carbonzero certified factory in Auckland," alongside claims of "We also use recyclable FSC cardboard to package our laundry detergent powder, soaps, skincare and oral care ranges." Broader assertions include "we've worked really hard to make safer products you can trust" and "Each product is also compatible with septic tanks and gray water systems."
13 verbatim representations captured. 24 third-party trackers detected. 4 accessibility violations on scanned pages. 21 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals; sealed PDF ~15–25 pages.
Case theory: FTC Green Guides / Lanham §43(a) / UCL
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-07).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.