Greenwashing
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 7, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #652
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: Minnesota
Nat'l classNationwide plausible — FTC / Lanham
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsFTC §5 / Green Guides (16 CFR 260) / Lanham Act §43(a) / UCL §17200 / FAL §17500 / CLRA
**Greenwashing / Eco Claims**
Consumer-facing platform defendant made unqualified biodegradability and environmental benefit claims in violation of FTC §5, the Green Guides (16 CFR 260), Lanham Act §43(a), and state consumer protection statutes (UCL §17200, FAL §17500, CLRA).
Defendant represented: "These are 100% biodegradable, fit any dishwasher, and most importantly, they actually work." Also claimed "plant- and mineral-based products," "a first-of-its-kind concentrate with ingredients gentle enough for even the most chemically sensitive," "no fragrances, no harsh chemicals, no compromises," "microplastic-free clean," and "replaces all cleaning supplies when diluted with water."
212 third-party trackers fired during site navigation. 2 accessibility violations detected across scanned pages. 17 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals captured.
Sealed PDF (~15–25 pages) with full screenshot chain-of-custody available upon purchase.
Case theory: FTC Green Guides / Lanham §43(a) / UCL
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-07).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.