FDA Misclaim
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 8, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #647
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: Utah
Nat'l classNationwide plausible — FTC §5 / FDCA
ArbitrationClass-viable — browsewrap, likely unenforceable
ClaimsFTC §5 / FDCA §503A misbranding / CLRA / Lanham Act
**FTC §5 / FDCA §503A Misbranding – Compounded Dietary Supplement Claims**
A consumer-facing platform markets compounded and dietary supplement products with unsubstantiated efficacy and source-attribution claims. The run captured 31 verbatim representations, including "[DEFENDANT]" assertions that products contain "1g of clinically proven creatine per chew," "Enhances cognitive function & ATP production," and "Steadier energy through glucose regulation*." The platform also represents "100% of NFL teams using Momentous products in their locker rooms" and "The U.S. Department of Defense has awarded 11* innovation and research contracts to Momentous"—claims implicating Lanham Act false advertising and CLRA unfair competition standards.
Technical footprint includes 621 third-party tracker fires and 8 accessibility violations across the scanned domain. No wrap evidence detected. Chain-of-custody sealed across 49 screenshots and ~15–25 pages of PDF documentation.
Case theory: FTC §5 / FDCA misbranding
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.