Greenwashing
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 8, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #646
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: Illinois
Nat'l classNationwide plausible — FTC / Lanham
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsFTC §5 / Green Guides (16 CFR 260) / Lanham Act §43(a) / UCL §17200 / FAL §17500 / CLRA
**GREENWASHING / ECO CLAIMS**
Consumer-facing e-commerce platform making unsubstantiated environmental claims in product listings and checkout messaging. Case theory: FTC §5 / Green Guides (16 CFR 260) / Lanham Act §43(a) / UCL §17200 / FAL §17500 / CLRA.
Ten verbatim eco representations captured across product pages, including "Wooden Squeegee - 100% FSC Certified," "Knitted Organic Cotton Dishcloth | Zero-Waste, Plastic-Free Kitchen Cleaning Cloth," "Organic Cotton Nut Milk Bag," "Carbon-neutral Shipping on all Orders Shipped from [DEFENDANT]," "Our products are made from sustainable materials like bamboo and organic cotton," "Swedish Dishcloth | Reusable & Biodegradable Paper Towel Alternative," "Biodegradable Toothbrush Pack of 2," and "Biodegradable Charcoal Dental Floss Picks."
158 third-party trackers firing across the domain. 3 accessibility violations identified. 25 screenshots with forensic chain-of-custody seals. Sealed PDF: 15–25 pages.
Case theory: FTC Green Guides / Lanham §43(a) / UCL
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.