Sealed forensic record · Report #645

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationU.S. · operates nationally

Nat'l classNationwide plausible — FTC / Lanham

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target

ClaimsFTC §5 / Green Guides (16 CFR 260) / Lanham Act §43(a) / UCL §17200 / FAL §17500 / CLRA

**GREENWASHING / ECO CLAIMS** FTC §5, Green Guides (16 CFR 260), Lanham Act §43(a), UCL §17200, FAL §17500, CLRA — claims of compostability certifications, environmental safety, and waste diversion. An AI services platform represents products as "[DEFENDANT] meets these rigorous standards, guaranteeing our bags break down completely and safely in industrial composting facilities" and "keeping organic waste out of landfills." The platform claims "Certified Compostable Film Products" and states "BPI is the most recognized compostable certification in North America." It represents that "Every [DEFENDANT]® compostable bag and liner is BPI certified and CMA approved" and that products "ensure that products are PFAs free." The platform describes BPI certification as "a laboratory controlled testing certification" that "aims to show that a product will break down in the right laboratory." 56 third-party trackers captured. 6 accessibility violations across pages scanned. 14 verbatim representations documented. Sealed PDF chain-of-custody: 37 screenshots, ~15–25 pages.

Case theory: FTC Green Guides / Lanham §43(a) / UCL

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase

✓ Prior-litigation check: clear. No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory (CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.