Broken Cookie Banner
Flagship
$1,000
Captured Jun 8, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #520
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationU.S. · operates nationally
Nat'l classCalif. statewide — CIPA is state law
ArbitrationClass-viable — browsewrap, likely unenforceable
ClaimsCIPA § 631 / Smith v. LoanMe (Cal. 2021) / Javier v. Assurance IQ (9th Cir. 2022) / In re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litig.
**Case Theory**
CIPA § 631 cookie-consent violation. Applicable precedent: *Smith v. LoanMe* (Cal. 2021), *Javier v. Assurance IQ* (9th Cir. 2022), *In re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litig.*
**Tease**
Large consumer-facing platform. Agent captured 207 third-party tracker fires during site traversal. Three accessibility violations documented across scanned pages. Seven screenshots with sealed chain-of-custody documentation. No verbatim user-facing representations obtained; findings remain unclassified pending further review. Evidence suggests cookie-banner mechanics may permit tracker deployment prior to affirmative consent.
15–25 pages, sealed PDF with forensic chain-of-custody seals.
Case theory: CIPA § 631 — consent-defect
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
⚠ Prior-litigation check: caution.
No lane query terms defined for broken_cookie_banner; editor must review manually.
Full match list included in the sealed PDF appendix; buyer should review before filing. Checked .
Full match list included in the sealed PDF appendix; buyer should review before filing. Checked .