Sealed forensic record · Report #496

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationHQ: England

Nat'l classCalif. statewide — CIPA is state law

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target (sign-in-wrap, high consumer volume, top-19k site)

ClaimsCIPA / California Wiretap Act / Pen-Trap / VPPA

**PIXELS & WEB PRIVACY** Consumer-facing platform under California Penal Code §631 (wiretap), §632 (pen-trap), and 18 U.S.C. §2710 (VPPA). Agent captured 110 third-party tracker fires across crawl, indicating persistent real-time data collection without explicit user consent disclosures at point of collection. Accessibility audit identified 6 violations across scanned pages, suggesting potential ADA/WCAG non-compliance layered onto privacy infrastructure. No verbatim user-facing representations were extracted; findings remain unclassified pending buyer review. 5 screenshots with forensic seals. Sealed PDF chain: ~15–25 pages, full custody documentation included.

Case theory: CIPA / Wiretap / VPPA

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase

✓ Prior-litigation check: clear. No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory (CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.