← Back to marketplace
Pixels & Web Privacy Premium
$500
Captured Jun 8, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody · Site state has likely changed

Sealed forensic record · Report #485

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationU.S. · operates nationally
Nat'l classCalif. statewide — CIPA is state law
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsCIPA / California Wiretap Act / Pen-Trap / VPPA
**PIXELS & WEB PRIVACY** This tease concerns an AI services platform defendant and potential violations of California's Wiretap Act (Penal Code § 631), CIPA (Civil Code § 1798.100 et seq.), pen-trap statutes, and the Video Privacy Protection Act (18 U.S.C. § 2710). The run captured 236 third-party tracker fires during scope navigation. No verbatim representations were obtained; the agent encountered an embedded CAPTCHA barrier that prevented deeper instrumentation. One screenshot with chain-of-custody seals documents the tracker activity. The sealed PDF spans approximately 15–25 pages and preserves the technical evidence chain.

Case theory: CIPA / Wiretap / VPPA

What you receive

  • Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
  • Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
  • Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
  • Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
  • Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
  • Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear. No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory (CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-08).
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant in this lane.

First buyer holds the hash exclusively. Once we confirm payment, the defendant identity is revealed, the listing disappears, and the sealed PDF is emailed within minutes. No other firm receives this record.