Sealed forensic record · Report #449

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationHQ: Florida

Nat'l classCalif. statewide — CIPA is state law

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target

ClaimsCIPA / California Wiretap Act / Pen-Trap / VPPA

**PIXELS & WEB PRIVACY — CIPA / California Wiretap Act / Pen-Trap / VPPA** Consumer-facing platform defendant. Agent completed 12 turns without scope restrictions. Run captured 23 third-party tracker fires across ~15–25 pages of sealed PDF. Zero verbatim user-facing representations were documented. Zero accessibility violations identified. Chain-of-custody seals intact across 21 screenshots. Tracker activity spans multiple domains and firing patterns. No wrap evidence. Scope permitted full enumeration of third-party data transmission points. Sealed PDF: ~15–25 pages, 21 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals.

Case theory: CIPA / Wiretap / VPPA

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase