Deceptive Pricing
Premium
$500
Captured Jun 7, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #409
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationHQ: Michigan
Nat'l classCalif. / multistate — UCL / FAL / CLRA
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsUCL §17200 / FAL §17500 / CLRA §1750
**Deceptive Pricing — UCL §17200 / FAL §17500 / CLRA §1750**
Consumer-facing mattress platform. Agent captured 17 verbatim representations across pricing, warranty, financing, and performance claims during a 12-turn run. No third-party trackers or accessibility violations detected.
Representations include: "Save up to 35% on mattresses," "100-Night Risk-Free Trial," "10-Year Limited Warranty," "Free Mattress Delivery," "9 out of 10 customers report improved sleep quality," "5 highly rated mattresses by Consumer Reports including two top-rated mattresses," "Financing options as low as 0% APR on mattresses," and "Monthly options with rates as low as 0% APR, subject to eligibility."
10 screenshots with chain-of-custody seals. Sealed PDF: ~15–25 pages.
Case theory: UCL §17200 / FAL / CLRA
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase
✓ Prior-litigation check: clear.
No prior plaintiff-class filing found against this defendant on this theory
(CourtListener federal + web search of state courts, checked 2026-06-07).
Safe to list (theory not yet litigated), but defendant has 3 active suit(s) on a DIFFERENT theory — disclose: WILKINS v. this defendant Sleep, Inc.; MCMORLAND v. this defendant SLEEP INC
⚠ Note: this defendant has 3 active class action(s) on a different legal theory (not this lane) — named and cited in the sealed report so you can assess coordination / related-case rules.
Safe to list (theory not yet litigated), but defendant has 3 active suit(s) on a DIFFERENT theory — disclose: WILKINS v. this defendant Sleep, Inc.; MCMORLAND v. this defendant SLEEP INC
⚠ Note: this defendant has 3 active class action(s) on a different legal theory (not this lane) — named and cited in the sealed report so you can assess coordination / related-case rules.