Sealed forensic record · Report #2308

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationHQ: California

Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target

ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law

**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Consumer Platform** This defendant, a consumer-facing platform, operates a website that fails to meet WCAG 2.1 accessibility standards under *Robles v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.*, 9th Cir. (establishing Title III liability for digital barriers). The run identified 23 accessibility violations across the scanned pages, rendering core functionality inaccessible to users with disabilities in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act Title III and the Unruh Civil Rights Act. The investigation also captured 244 third-party tracker fires during site navigation, indicating pervasive data collection infrastructure. Evidence includes 28 screenshots with forensic chain-of-custody seals, compiled in a sealed PDF (~15–25 pages).

Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase