Sealed forensic record · Report #2208

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationU.S. · operates nationally

Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target

ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law

**ADA Title III Web Accessibility / Robles v. Domino's** Consumer-facing platform defendant operates a website with accessibility barriers affecting users with visual and motor impairments. The site contains 8 accessibility violations across scanned pages. Separately, the domain fires 30 third-party trackers during user sessions. The defendant's product representations include: "Normalizes scalp conditions. Stimulates hair growth, adds volume and shine. Makes hair look thicker and fuller." Also: "Included in Elle's list of best natural hair and skincare, free of silicones and glutens, Reverie Shampoo imparts gloss and strengthens strands." And: "Unique whole body cream - listed in top ten skincare lists compiled by Elle, Glamour and more." The site further states: "Appears in InStyle's '11 of the Best Natural Beauty Products You Can Find at the Drugstore'." Applicable statutes: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 (ADA Title III); California Unruh Civil Rights Act; New York Human Rights Law § 296. Evidence sealed in 29 screenshots across a 15–25 page PDF with chain-of-custody certification.

Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase