Sealed forensic record · Report #2176

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationU.S. · operates nationally

Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target

ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law

**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Cosmetics & Beauty Brand** A mid-market cosmetics and beauty brand operates a website that fails to meet accessibility standards under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as established in *Robles v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.* (9th Cir. 2019), and violates the Unruh Civil Rights Act and New York State Human Rights Law. The website contains 8 accessibility violations across scanned pages. Third-party tracking infrastructure fires 15 times during standard user navigation. The defendant markets itself as "The best cosmetics without synthetics since 1997!"—a representation appearing twice in captured materials. Sealed PDF chain-of-custody verified across 21 screenshots and ~15–25 pages of documentation.

Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase