Sealed forensic record · Report #1986

What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.

Case at a glance

LocationHQ: Arizona

Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III

ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target

ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law

**ADA Title III / Web Accessibility — Consumer Platform** A consumer-facing platform defendant faces exposure under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, *Robles v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.*, 9th Cir., the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, and New York State Human Rights Law for alleged barriers to digital access. The platform represents that "[DEFENDANT] Provider and patient data is HIPAA Secure & Encrypted," yet testing identified 8 accessibility violations across scanned pages. Third-party tracking infrastructure captured 108 tracker fires during navigation. Screenshots document the findings with chain-of-custody seals. The sealed PDF (~15–25 pages) contains full methodology and visual evidence.

Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles

What you receive

Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase