ADA / Web Accessibility
Premium
$500
Captured Jul 13, 2026 · FRE 901 chain of custody ·
Site state has likely changed
Sealed forensic record · Report #1982
What's for sale here is a dated, hashed snapshot of a defendant's live tracking behavior, marketing representations, and consent UX, sealed under FRE 901 chain of custody on the day we captured it. Defendants rewrite their policies and pull their pixels the moment a complaint lands — this record is the only proof of what the site was doing before.
Case at a glance
LocationU.S. · operates nationally
Nat'l classScope varies — ADA Title III
ArbitrationArb risk — mass-arbitration target
ClaimsADA Title III / Robles v. Domino's (9th Cir.) / Unruh Civil Rights Act / NY State Human Rights Law
**ADA Title III Web Accessibility — Consumer Platform**
This consumer-facing platform operates under potential liability under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and New York State Human Rights Law, following the framework established in *Robles v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.* (9th Cir. 2019).
The platform's website contains 26 accessibility violations across scanned pages, preventing users with disabilities from navigating and accessing core functionality. Third-party tracking infrastructure fired 171 times during the audit, raising questions about data collection practices and vendor accountability. Screenshots document the violations with chain-of-custody seals. The sealed PDF contains approximately 15–25 pages of technical findings and visual evidence.
**Sealed PDF: 30 screenshots, chain-of-custody verified.**
Case theory: ADA Title III / Robles
What you receive
- Sealed PDF report (typical 15–28 pp) with full chain of custody — SHA-256 + RFC 3161 timestamps on every artifact
- Verbatim binding representations with Wayback-anchored class-period bounds
- Full network capture: every tracker fire, sensitive transmission, identity-sync event
- Wrap classification: BROWSEWRAP / CLICKWRAP / SIGN-IN-WRAP verdict + Specht-line alignment
- Per-circuit case-law alignment (LIKELY_UNENFORCEABLE / LIKELY_ENFORCEABLE / JURISDICTIONALLY_DEPENDENT)
- Defendant name + domain — revealed at purchase